Are you thinking of publishing for the first time, or not sure where best to submit your manuscript? The IEEE has more than 170 journals covering a broad spectrum of engineering and technology areas plus open access options. This session will talk through how to find the right journal to submit to, an overview of the process and some helpful tips to help give your paper the best chance of acceptance. This session will cover:
An introduction and why publish with the IEEE
Choosing the best fit periodical or conference for your research
Preparing the manuscript
Submitting the article
What editors look for
Why a paper may be rejected
IEEE Open Access Publishing
Common best practices and errors when writing a paper
Tools and resources to help authors
If you would like any more information about this talk, please contact your subject librarian.
HEFCE’s policy for open access outputs in the post-2014 REF will be implemented on the 1st April 2016. The policy states:
To be eligible for submission to the post-2014 REF, authors’ outputs must have been deposited in an institutional or subject repository. Deposited material should be discoverable, and free to read and download, for anyone with an internet connection. The requirement applies only to journal articles and conference proceedings with an International Standard Serial Number. The policy applies to research outputs accepted for publication after 1 April 2016.
The policy allows repositories to respect embargo periods set by publications. Where a publication specifies an embargo period, authors can comply with the policy by making a ‘closed’ deposit. Closed deposits must be discoverable to anyone with an Internet connection before the full text becomes available for read and download (which will occur after the embargo period has elapsed).
There are a number of exceptions to the various requirements that will be allowed by the policy.
The policy will apply to all manuscripts accepted for publication from 1 April 2016 so when you deposit in the Ulster Institutional Repository, make sure you include your final accepted post-print manuscript. Further details and useful information can be found in our Open Access Guide, Please email firstname.lastname@example.org if you have any queries.
A review published in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology has established a link between high-quality systematic reviews and librarian co-authorship (Rethlefsen et al. 2015).
The authors found that where librarians or information specialists formed part of the review team, the resulting SRs achieved significantly better outcomes in respect of these areas:
Search reporting and reproducibility
Adherence to United States Institute of Medicine systematic review standards (Institute of Medicine 2011)*
Definition and input of search terms
The review found that these elements combine to alleviate the problems of bias inherent in many SRs – particularly publication bias, time-lag bias, location bias and language bias. View it here (Ulster login required).
* Other systematic review standards are available; see Higgins et al. (2011).
Higgins, J. and Green, S. (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Version 5.1.0. London: The Cochrane Collaboration. Available at: http://handbook.cochrane.org/. [Accessed 1 March 2016].
Institute of Medicine (2011) Committee on standards for systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research. In: Eden J. ed. Finding what works in health care : standards for systematic reviews. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press.
Rethlefsen, M. L., Farrell, A. M., Osterhaus Trzasco, L. H. and Brigham, T. J. (2015) Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 68(6), 617 – 626.
Alexander Street Press has offered the Library an extended trial to Academic Video Online Premium, a multi-disciplinary collection of videos. For the Arts, subject areas include news and current events, documentary, history, music, dance, drama & theatre.
Trial ends 30th April 2016. Please forward feedback to myself or any member of the Arts subject team.
The Library is committed to providing the highest quality information services and resources to our doctoral students. To do this, we need to know how best to support you in your research and also to find out about your training needs. We would be very grateful if you would take part in this short survey. Your responses and comments will shape the services and resources we provide and help determine any improvements needed to the support we offer you in the future.
The survey should take no more than 15 minutes to complete and all your answers are anonymous and will be used solely for the purposes of this survey. Your views matter to us so please complete the survey. Thank you for your cooperation.
INVENT 2016 awards are now open. Mission: to find Northern Ireland’s inventions with the greatest commercial potential.
INVENT challenges inventors, entrepreneurs, scientists and start-ups with proof-of-concepts and prototypes in science and technology to discover the commercial potential of their idea. Entrants compete through rounds of pitching to win a share of the £33,000 prize fund, access to a global network and a place on the NI Tech Mission to California.
The competition categories include Creative Media & Consumer Internet; Engineering; Agri-Science; Life & Health; Electronics; and Enterprise Software.
The closing date for applications is 8 APRIL 2016
Invent will be holding a series briefing sessions across the campuses.
Further information about funding, Open Access publishing and the Ulster Institutional Repository is available from the Library’s Open Access Subject Guide, available at guides.library.ulster.ac.uk/openaccess
h-index by Ael 2 at English Wikipedia [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
There has been a surge of new scholarly communication tools in recent years. But how are researchers incorporating these tools into their research workflows? Jeroen Bosman and Bianca Kramer are conducting a global survey to investigate the choices researchers are making and why. Insights from these surveys will be valuable for libraries, research support, funders, but also for researchers themselves. more….
“From government-led population drives during the early nineteenth century through to mass steamship travel, Migration to New Worldsshowcases unique primary source material recounting the many and varied personal experiences of 350 years of migration. Explore Colonial Office files on emigration, diaries and travel journals, ship logs and plans, printed literature, objects, watercolours, and oral histories supplemented by carefully selected secondary research aids. “